From 3cc4da28ed52e9fa733f636e8a95774493161292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Halter <davidhalter88@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:56:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix lambda_nocond.

---
 jedi/parser/__init__.py    | 1 +
 test/completion/lambdas.py | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/jedi/parser/__init__.py b/jedi/parser/__init__.py
index 9d7706e3..45bace33 100644
--- a/jedi/parser/__init__.py
+++ b/jedi/parser/__init__.py
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ class Parser(object):
             'comp_for': pt.CompFor,
             'decorator': pt.Decorator,
             'lambdef': pt.Lambda,
+            'lambdef_nocond': pt.Lambda,
         }
 
         self.global_names = []
diff --git a/test/completion/lambdas.py b/test/completion/lambdas.py
index 06b121e5..d7391691 100644
--- a/test/completion/lambdas.py
+++ b/test/completion/lambdas.py
@@ -95,3 +95,12 @@ class Test(object):
         self.a
         #? float()
         pred(1.0, 2)
+
+# -----------------
+# test_nocond in grammar (happens in list comprehensions with `if`)
+# -----------------
+# Doesn't need to do anything yet. It should just not raise an error. These
+# nocond lambdas make no sense at all.
+
+#? int()
+[a for a in [1,2] if lambda: 3][0]