forked from VimPlug/jedi
Refactor so typing uses BaseTypingValueWithGenerics
This makes it finally possible to use type vars with Callable and some other classes. Fixes #1413
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,43 +10,6 @@ from jedi.inference.context import ClassContext
|
||||
from jedi.inference.gradual.generics import TupleGenericManager
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class BaseTypingValue(Value):
|
||||
def __init__(self, inference_state, parent_context, tree_name):
|
||||
super(BaseTypingValue, self).__init__(inference_state, parent_context)
|
||||
self._tree_name = tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def tree_node(self):
|
||||
return self._tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
def get_filters(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
# TODO this is obviously wrong. Is it though?
|
||||
class EmptyFilter(ClassFilter):
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
def get(self, name, **kwargs):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
def values(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
yield EmptyFilter()
|
||||
|
||||
def py__class__(self):
|
||||
# TODO this is obviously not correct, but at least gives us a class if
|
||||
# we have none. Some of these objects don't really have a base class in
|
||||
# typeshed.
|
||||
return builtin_from_name(self.inference_state, u'object')
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def name(self):
|
||||
return ValueName(self, self._tree_name)
|
||||
|
||||
def __repr__(self):
|
||||
return '%s(%s)' % (self.__class__.__name__, self._tree_name.value)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _BoundTypeVarName(AbstractNameDefinition):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
This type var was bound to a certain type, e.g. int.
|
||||
@@ -264,3 +227,68 @@ class _GenericInstanceWrapper(ValueWrapper):
|
||||
elif cls.py__name__() == 'Iterator':
|
||||
return ValueSet([builtin_from_name(self.inference_state, u'None')])
|
||||
return self._wrapped_value.py__stop_iteration_returns()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _PseudoTreeNameClass(Value):
|
||||
def __init__(self, parent_context, tree_name):
|
||||
super(_PseudoTreeNameClass, self).__init__(
|
||||
parent_context.inference_state,
|
||||
parent_context
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._tree_name = tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def tree_node(self):
|
||||
return self._tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
def get_filters(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
# TODO this is obviously wrong. Is it though?
|
||||
class EmptyFilter(ClassFilter):
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
def get(self, name, **kwargs):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
def values(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
yield EmptyFilter()
|
||||
|
||||
def py__class__(self):
|
||||
# TODO this is obviously not correct, but at least gives us a class if
|
||||
# we have none. Some of these objects don't really have a base class in
|
||||
# typeshed.
|
||||
return builtin_from_name(self.inference_state, u'object')
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def name(self):
|
||||
return ValueName(self, self._tree_name)
|
||||
|
||||
def __repr__(self):
|
||||
return '%s(%s)' % (self.__class__.__name__, self._tree_name.value)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class BaseTypingValue(LazyValueWrapper):
|
||||
def __init__(self, parent_context, tree_name):
|
||||
self.inference_state = parent_context.inference_state
|
||||
self.parent_context = parent_context
|
||||
self._tree_name = tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def name(self):
|
||||
return ValueName(self, self._tree_name)
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_wrapped_value(self):
|
||||
return _PseudoTreeNameClass(self.parent_context, self._tree_name)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class BaseTypingValueWithGenerics(DefineGenericBase):
|
||||
def __init__(self, parent_context, tree_name, generics_manager):
|
||||
super(BaseTypingValueWithGenerics, self).__init__(generics_manager)
|
||||
self.inference_state = parent_context.inference_state
|
||||
self.parent_context = parent_context
|
||||
self._tree_name = tree_name
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_wrapped_value(self):
|
||||
return _PseudoTreeNameClass(self.parent_context, self._tree_name)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user