From c9e4cdaba1fe75aee559d08f0538611cf4131fd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Halter Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:34:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Get rid of another private access --- jedi/inference/value/instance.py | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/jedi/inference/value/instance.py b/jedi/inference/value/instance.py index 2e97482b..7eb32ac0 100644 --- a/jedi/inference/value/instance.py +++ b/jedi/inference/value/instance.py @@ -432,16 +432,14 @@ class SelfName(TreeNameDefinition): class LazyInstanceClassName(object): - def __init__(self, instance, class_context, class_member_name): + def __init__(self, instance, class_member_name): self._instance = instance - self.class_context = class_context self._class_member_name = class_member_name @iterator_to_value_set def infer(self): for result_value in self._class_member_name.infer(): - # TODO private access! - for c in apply_py__get__(result_value, self._instance, self.class_context._value): + for c in apply_py__get__(result_value, self._instance, self._instance.py__class__()): yield c def __getattr__(self, name): @@ -454,7 +452,7 @@ class LazyInstanceClassName(object): class InstanceClassFilter(AbstractFilter): """ This filter is special in that it uses the class filter and wraps the - resulting names in LazyINstanceClassName. The idea is that the class name + resulting names in LazyInstanceClassName. The idea is that the class name filtering can be very flexible and always be reflected in instances. """ def __init__(self, instance, class_filter): @@ -469,7 +467,7 @@ class InstanceClassFilter(AbstractFilter): def _convert(self, names): return [ - LazyInstanceClassName(self._instance, self._class_filter.parent_context, n) + LazyInstanceClassName(self._instance, n) for n in names ]