no confusions in executions for dict assignments, fixes #83

jedi/evaluate.py

@@ -1066,13 +1066,17 @@ def get_scopes_for_name(scope, name_str, position=None, search_global=False,
                             if is_execution(a):
                                 return True
                         elif a.isinstance(parsing.Call):
-                            if a.name == name and a.execution:
+                            # Compare start_pos, because names may be different
+                            # because of executions.
+                            if a.name.start_pos == name.start_pos \
+                                                            and a.execution:
                                 return True
                     return False
 
                 is_exe = False
                 for op, assignee in par.assignment_details:
                     is_exe |= is_execution(assignee)
+
                 if is_exe:
                     # filter array[3] = ...
                     # TODO check executions for dict contents

jedi/parsing.py

@@ -766,8 +766,7 @@ class Statement(Simple):
                     self._assignment_details.append((tok, top))
                     # All these calls wouldn't be important if nonlocal would
                     # exist. -> Initialize the first item again.
-                    result = Array(start_pos, Array.NOARRAY, self)
-                    top = result
+                    top = result = Array(start_pos, Array.NOARRAY, self)
                     level = 0
                     close_brackets = False
                     is_chain = False
@@ -776,6 +775,7 @@ class Statement(Simple):
                     next(tok_iter, None)
                     continue
 
+            # here starts the statement creation madness!
             brackets = {'(': Array.TUPLE, '[': Array.LIST, '{': Array.SET}
             is_call = lambda: type(result) == Call
             is_call_or_close = lambda: is_call() or close_brackets

test/completion/arrays.py

@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ dic2[r'asdf']
 dic2['just_something']
 
 def f():
+    """ github #83 """
     r = {}
     r['status'] = (200, 'ok')
     return r