This pull request is a follow-up to https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/7214.
In short, within that mypy issue, we found it would be helpful to
determine between contextmanagers that can "swallow" exceptions vs ones
that can't. This helps prevent some false positive when using flags that
analyze control flow such as `--warn-unreachable`. To do this,
Jelle proposed assuming that only contextmanagers where the `__exit__`
returns `bool` are assumed to swallow exceptions.
This unfortunately required the following typeshed changes:
1. The typing.IO, threading.Lock, and concurrent.futures.Executor
were all modified so `__exit__` returns `Optional[None]` instead
of None -- along with all of their subclasses.
I believe these three types are meant to be subclassed, so I felt
picking the more general type was correct.
2. There were also a few concrete types (e.g. see socketserver,
subprocess, ftplib...) that I modified to return `None` -- I checked
the source code, and these all seem to return None (and don't appear
to be meant to be subclassable).
3. contextlib.suppress was changed to return bool. I also double-checked
the unittest modules and modified a subset of those contextmanagers,
leaving ones like `_AssertRaisesContext` alone.
Fixes#975
And a few more things I noticed while reading the tempfile docs.
In 3.5, most functions in tempfile were changed to accept either str or bytes in their prefix and suffix arguments, and return bytes or str accordingly. This seemed like a case for AnyStr.
We were missing tempdirb and tempprefixb, added in 3.5.
TemporaryFile and others were declared as returning BinaryIO, but they actually return either binary or text IO depending on the mode passed in. I changed the return type to IO[Any], similar to builtins.open.
