forked from VimPlug/jedi
Clarify generic tuple inference
This hoist a loop invariant conditional check outside the loop making it clearer and one branch more obviously similar to the general type handling.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -445,37 +445,37 @@ def _infer_type_vars(annotation_value, value_set, is_class_value=False):
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
elif annotation_name == 'Tuple':
|
||||
# TODO: this logic is pretty similar to the general logic below, can
|
||||
# we combine them?
|
||||
annotation_generics = annotation_value.get_generics()
|
||||
tuple_annotation, = annotation_value.execute_annotation()
|
||||
# TODO: is can we avoid using this private method?
|
||||
if tuple_annotation._is_homogenous():
|
||||
# The parameter annotation is of the form `Tuple[T, ...]`,
|
||||
# so we treat the incoming tuple like a iterable sequence
|
||||
# rather than a positional container of elements.
|
||||
for nested_annotation_value in annotation_generics[0]:
|
||||
_merge_type_var_dicts(
|
||||
type_var_dict,
|
||||
_infer_type_vars(
|
||||
nested_annotation_value,
|
||||
value_set.merge_types_of_iterate(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# The parameter annotation has only explicit type parameters
|
||||
# (e.g: `Tuple[T]`, `Tuple[T, U]`, `Tuple[T, U, V]`, etc.) so we
|
||||
# treat the incoming values as needing to match the annotation
|
||||
# exactly, just as we would for non-tuple annotations.
|
||||
|
||||
for element in value_set:
|
||||
py_class = element.get_annotated_class_object()
|
||||
if not isinstance(py_class, GenericClass):
|
||||
py_class = element
|
||||
# TODO: this logic is pretty similar to the general logic below, can
|
||||
# we combine them?
|
||||
|
||||
if not isinstance(py_class, DefineGenericBase):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
for element in value_set:
|
||||
py_class = element.get_annotated_class_object()
|
||||
if not isinstance(py_class, GenericClass):
|
||||
py_class = element
|
||||
|
||||
annotation_generics = annotation_value.get_generics()
|
||||
tuple_annotation, = annotation_value.execute_annotation()
|
||||
# TODO: is can we avoid using this private method?
|
||||
if tuple_annotation._is_homogenous():
|
||||
# The parameter annotation is of the form `Tuple[T, ...]`,
|
||||
# so we treat the incoming tuple like a iterable sequence
|
||||
# rather than a positional container of elements.
|
||||
for nested_annotation_value in annotation_generics[0]:
|
||||
_merge_type_var_dicts(
|
||||
type_var_dict,
|
||||
_infer_type_vars(
|
||||
nested_annotation_value,
|
||||
value_set.merge_types_of_iterate(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# The parameter annotation has only explicit type parameters
|
||||
# (e.g: `Tuple[T]`, `Tuple[T, U]`, `Tuple[T, U, V]`, etc.) so we
|
||||
# treat the incoming values as needing to match the annotation
|
||||
# exactly, just as we would for non-tuple annotations.
|
||||
if not isinstance(py_class, DefineGenericBase):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
actual_generics = py_class.get_generics()
|
||||
merge_pairwise_generics(annotation_generics, actual_generics)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user