removed related_names occurences in favor of usages

This commit is contained in:
David Halter
2013-05-03 21:04:36 +04:30
parent 860cc5de04
commit efeeee9706
6 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ class Script(object):
def _goto(self, add_import_name=False):
"""
Used for goto and related_names.
Used for goto and usages.
:param add_import_name: TODO add description
"""
def follow_inexistent_imports(defs):
@@ -409,12 +409,12 @@ class Script(object):
if unicode(v.names[-1]) == search_name]
if not isinstance(user_stmt, pr.Import):
# import case is looked at with add_import_name option
definitions = dynamic.related_name_add_import_modules(definitions,
definitions = dynamic.usages_add_import_modules(definitions,
search_name)
module = set([d.get_parent_until() for d in definitions])
module.add(self._parser.module)
names = dynamic.related_names(definitions, search_name, module)
names = dynamic.usages(definitions, search_name, module)
for d in set(definitions):
if isinstance(d, pr.Module):

View File

@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ class ArrayInstance(pr.Base):
return items
def related_names(definitions, search_name, mods):
def usages(definitions, search_name, mods):
def compare_array(definitions):
""" `definitions` are being compared by module/start_pos, because
sometimes the id's of the objects change (e.g. executions).
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ def related_names(definitions, search_name, mods):
for f in follow:
follow_res, search = evaluate.goto(call.parent, f)
follow_res = related_name_add_import_modules(follow_res, search)
follow_res = usages_add_import_modules(follow_res, search)
compare_follow_res = compare_array(follow_res)
# compare to see if they match
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ def related_names(definitions, search_name, mods):
return names
def related_name_add_import_modules(definitions, search_name):
def usages_add_import_modules(definitions, search_name):
""" Adds the modules of the imports """
new = set()
for d in definitions:

View File

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ def rename(script, new_name):
:type source: str
:return: list of changed lines/changed files
"""
return Refactoring(_rename(script.related_names(), new_name))
return Refactoring(_rename(script.usages(), new_name))
def _rename(names, replace_str):
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ def inline(script):
with common.ignored(AssertionError):
assert len(definitions) == 1
stmt = definitions[0]._definition
related_names = script.related_names()
inlines = [r for r in related_names
usages = script.usages()
inlines = [r for r in usages
if not stmt.start_pos <= r.start_pos <= stmt.end_pos]
inlines = sorted(inlines, key=lambda x: (x.module_path, x.start_pos),
reverse=True)

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
"""
Test coverage for renaming is mostly being done by testing
`Script.get_related_names`.
`Script.usages`.
"""
# --- simple

View File

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ class IntegrationTestCase(object):
TEST_COMPLETIONS: self.run_completion,
TEST_DEFINITIONS: self.run_definition,
TEST_ASSIGNMENTS: self.run_goto,
TEST_USAGES: self.run_related_name,
TEST_USAGES: self.run_usages,
}
return testers[self.test_type](compare_cb)
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ class IntegrationTestCase(object):
comp_str = str(sorted(str(r.description) for r in result))
return compare_cb(self, comp_str, self.correct)
def run_related_name(self, compare_cb):
result = self.script().related_names()
def run_usages(self, compare_cb):
result = self.script().usages()
self.correct = self.correct.strip()
compare = sorted((r.module_name, r.start_pos[0], r.start_pos[1])
for r in result)

View File

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ def make_definitions():
definitions += script.definition()
script2 = api.Script(source, 4, len('class C'), None)
definitions += script2.related_names()
definitions += script2.usages()
source_param = "def f(a): return a"
script_param = api.Script(source_param, 1, len(source_param), None)