Use a TypeGuard for dataclasses.is_dataclass(); refine asdict(), astuple(), fields(), replace() (#9362)

stdlib/dataclasses.pyi

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ import sys
 import types
 from builtins import type as Type  # alias to avoid name clashes with fields named "type"
 from collections.abc import Callable, Iterable, Mapping
-from typing import Any, Generic, Protocol, TypeVar, overload
-from typing_extensions import Literal, TypeAlias
+from typing import Any, ClassVar, Generic, Protocol, TypeVar, overload
+from typing_extensions import Literal, TypeAlias, TypeGuard
 
 if sys.version_info >= (3, 9):
     from types import GenericAlias
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ __all__ = [
 if sys.version_info >= (3, 10):
     __all__ += ["KW_ONLY"]
 
+class _DataclassInstance(Protocol):
+    __dataclass_fields__: ClassVar[dict[str, Field[Any]]]
+
+_DataclassT = TypeVar("_DataclassT", bound=_DataclassInstance)
+
 # define _MISSING_TYPE as an enum within the type stubs,
 # even though that is not really its type at runtime
 # this allows us to use Literal[_MISSING_TYPE.MISSING]
@@ -44,13 +49,13 @@ if sys.version_info >= (3, 10):
     class KW_ONLY: ...
 
 @overload
-def asdict(obj: Any) -> dict[str, Any]: ...
+def asdict(obj: _DataclassInstance) -> dict[str, Any]: ...
 @overload
-def asdict(obj: Any, *, dict_factory: Callable[[list[tuple[str, Any]]], _T]) -> _T: ...
+def asdict(obj: _DataclassInstance, *, dict_factory: Callable[[list[tuple[str, Any]]], _T]) -> _T: ...
 @overload
-def astuple(obj: Any) -> tuple[Any, ...]: ...
+def astuple(obj: _DataclassInstance) -> tuple[Any, ...]: ...
 @overload
-def astuple(obj: Any, *, tuple_factory: Callable[[list[Any]], _T]) -> _T: ...
+def astuple(obj: _DataclassInstance, *, tuple_factory: Callable[[list[Any]], _T]) -> _T: ...
 
 if sys.version_info >= (3, 8):
     # cls argument is now positional-only
@@ -212,8 +217,13 @@ else:
         metadata: Mapping[Any, Any] | None = ...,
     ) -> Any: ...
 
-def fields(class_or_instance: Any) -> tuple[Field[Any], ...]: ...
-def is_dataclass(obj: Any) -> bool: ...
+def fields(class_or_instance: _DataclassInstance | type[_DataclassInstance]) -> tuple[Field[Any], ...]: ...
+@overload
+def is_dataclass(obj: _DataclassInstance | type[_DataclassInstance]) -> Literal[True]: ...
+@overload
+def is_dataclass(obj: type) -> TypeGuard[type[_DataclassInstance]]: ...
+@overload
+def is_dataclass(obj: object) -> TypeGuard[_DataclassInstance | type[_DataclassInstance]]: ...
 
 class FrozenInstanceError(AttributeError): ...
 
@@ -285,4 +295,4 @@ else:
         frozen: bool = ...,
     ) -> type: ...
 
-def replace(__obj: _T, **changes: Any) -> _T: ...
+def replace(__obj: _DataclassT, **changes: Any) -> _DataclassT: ...

test_cases/stdlib/check_dataclasses.py

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import dataclasses as dc
+from typing import Any, Dict, Tuple, Type
+from typing_extensions import assert_type
+
+
+@dc.dataclass
+class Foo:
+    attr: str
+
+
+assert_type(dc.fields(Foo), Tuple[dc.Field[Any], ...])
+
+# Mypy correctly emits errors on these
+# due to the fact it's a dataclass class, not an instance.
+# Pyright, however, handles ClassVar members in protocols differently.
+# See https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/issues/4339
+#
+# dc.asdict(Foo)
+# dc.astuple(Foo)
+# dc.replace(Foo)
+
+if dc.is_dataclass(Foo):
+    # The inferred type doesn't change
+    # if it's already known to be a subtype of type[_DataclassInstance]
+    assert_type(Foo, Type[Foo])
+
+f = Foo(attr="attr")
+
+assert_type(dc.fields(f), Tuple[dc.Field[Any], ...])
+assert_type(dc.asdict(f), Dict[str, Any])
+assert_type(dc.astuple(f), Tuple[Any, ...])
+assert_type(dc.replace(f, attr="new"), Foo)
+
+if dc.is_dataclass(f):
+    # The inferred type doesn't change
+    # if it's already known to be a subtype of _DataclassInstance
+    assert_type(f, Foo)
+
+
+def test_other_isdataclass_overloads(x: type, y: object) -> None:
+    # TODO: pyright correctly emits an error on this, but mypy does not -- why?
+    # dc.fields(x)
+
+    dc.fields(y)  # type: ignore
+
+    dc.asdict(x)  # type: ignore
+    dc.asdict(y)  # type: ignore
+
+    dc.astuple(x)  # type: ignore
+    dc.astuple(y)  # type: ignore
+
+    dc.replace(x)  # type: ignore
+    dc.replace(y)  # type: ignore
+
+    if dc.is_dataclass(x):
+        assert_type(dc.fields(x), Tuple[dc.Field[Any], ...])
+        # These should cause type checkers to emit errors
+        # due to the fact it's a dataclass class, not an instance
+        dc.asdict(x)  # type: ignore
+        dc.astuple(x)  # type: ignore
+        dc.replace(x)  # type: ignore
+
+    if dc.is_dataclass(y):
+        assert_type(dc.fields(y), Tuple[dc.Field[Any], ...])
+
+        # Mypy corrextly emits an error on these due to the fact we don't know
+        # whether it's a dataclass class or a dataclass instance.
+        # Pyright, however, handles ClassVar members in protocols differently.
+        # See https://github.com/microsoft/pyright/issues/4339
+        #
+        # dc.asdict(y)
+        # dc.astuple(y)
+        # dc.replace(y)
+
+    if dc.is_dataclass(y) and not isinstance(y, type):
+        assert_type(dc.fields(y), Tuple[dc.Field[Any], ...])
+        assert_type(dc.asdict(y), Dict[str, Any])
+        assert_type(dc.astuple(y), Tuple[Any, ...])
+        dc.replace(y)